<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Llmc on Zero to One AI</title><link>https://blog.crazyai.uk/tags/llmc/</link><description>Recent content in Llmc on Zero to One AI</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 10:30:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.crazyai.uk/tags/llmc/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>There Is No Autograd Here</title><link>https://blog.crazyai.uk/posts/c-field-notes-02-there-is-no-autograd-here/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 10:30:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.crazyai.uk/posts/c-field-notes-02-there-is-no-autograd-here/</guid><description>llm.c&amp;#39;s CPU reference does not build a graph. Each layer is a handwritten forward paired with a handwritten backward, and training is forty-one updates of floats.</description></item><item><title>Python Writes the Answer Sheet</title><link>https://blog.crazyai.uk/posts/c-field-notes-01-python-writes-the-answer-sheet/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 10:20:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.crazyai.uk/posts/c-field-notes-01-python-writes-the-answer-sheet/</guid><description>I expected llm.c&amp;#39;s Python file to be the real trainer. It is mostly a GPT-2 reference plus a machine that prints the answers C has to match.</description></item></channel></rss>